This review delves into the Head Speed Pro tennis racquet series, comparing the three models: Pro, Midplus (MP), and Light. Each racquet features a Control Power Index (CPI) number – 300, 500, and 600 respectively – indicating its balance between power and control. The review explores how varying weight (310g, 300g, and 280g unstrung respectively) and balance point influence playability, focusing on maneuverability, stability, and the overall feel of each racket. The "catapult effect," a noticeable power boost, is also a key aspect of the analysis.The reviewer provides a detailed account of their experience with each racquet, highlighting strengths and weaknesses. This in-depth assessment contrasts the power-focused characteristics of the Speed Pro with the more balanced approach of the Speed MP, ultimately concluding which model offers the best blend of power and control for different player types. The review also sheds light on the shortcomings of the lightweight Speed Light model for this particular reviewer. Ultimately, the choice boils down to individual player preference and playing style, a factor that this review helps to clarify.
Pros And Cons
- Powerful
- Ball explodes off the strings
- Responsive
- Handle too short
- Control not the greatest
- Weight (310g) might be too heavy for some
- Maneuverability could be better
- Powerful
- Good backhand feel
- Maneuverable
- Ball gets 'sucked in' and shoots out fast
- Less control than the Pro
- Maneuverable
- Too light
- Feels bad on the back end
- Not enough mass
Read more: 5 Best Babolat Tennis Rackets to Dominate the Court
Head Speed Racquet Specifications and Control Power Index
The Head Speed series consists of three models: Pro, Midplus (MP), and Light. A unique feature is the number on the throat of each racket – 300 for the Pro, 500 for the MP, and 600 for the Light. These numbers represent the Control Power Index (CPI), indicating the balance between power and control. A higher number signifies more power, while a lower number denotes greater control.
The Pro (310g unstrung), MP (300g unstrung), and Light (280g unstrung) share similarities like a 100 sq in head size and similar shape. However, they differ in weight, swing weight, and balance point. Understanding the CPI helps in choosing the racket best suited for your playing style.
The weight variation impacts the feel and maneuverability of each racket. Lighter rackets offer better maneuverability, while heavier ones deliver greater power and stability. The balance point also plays a crucial role in determining how the racket feels and how easily you can swing it.
Head Speed Light: Maneuverability vs. Power
The Speed Light, at 280g unstrung, proved too light for this reviewer's preference. While its maneuverability was excellent, the lack of mass in the head resulted in a less stable feel, particularly on backhand shots. The lightweight design caused the racket to feel unstable and prone to errors.
Despite its lightness making it easy to swing, the lack of weight made it difficult to control powerful shots. The reviewer struggled with accuracy and power consistency, especially on shots requiring a strong backswing.
Ultimately, the Speed Light's lightness was deemed a significant drawback, impacting the overall playing experience negatively.
Head Speed MP: A Balanced Approach
The Speed MP (300g unstrung) offered a noticeable improvement in stability compared to the Light model. The reviewer experienced a significant difference in backhand shots, highlighting the benefits of added weight.
The racket’s “catapult effect,” where the ball feels sucked into the strings before launching, was praised. This contributed to the racket's impressive power, while still maintaining a responsive feel.
While categorized as a power racket, the Speed MP maintained a good balance with control, showcasing a satisfying blend of power and feel. The reviewer's forehand and backhand shots felt noticeably improved compared to the Speed Light.
Head Speed Pro: Raw Power and Control Considerations
The Head Speed Pro (310g unstrung) delivered impressive power. The reviewer described the ball launching off the racket with considerable force and speed, creating a powerful “catapult” effect similar to the MP.
However, the reviewer noted that the control wasn’t as refined as desired. While the power was exceptional, accuracy sometimes suffered, especially on shots requiring greater precision. The relatively short handle length was also a point of concern.
The weight, while contributing to the power, might hinder maneuverability for some players. Overall, the Speed Pro is a powerful racket but requires a player with strong technique and the ability to control the added power.
Head-to-Head Comparison and Conclusion
The Speed Pro and Speed MP both offered significant power but differed in control. The MP provided a more balanced approach, while the Pro prioritized power over control. The Speed Light was deemed too light for this reviewer.
The Speed Pro’s shorter handle length and lower control were noted as drawbacks. The MP, despite slightly less power, offered better control and overall feel. Ultimately, individual preferences heavily influence the choice between the Pro and the MP.
The reviewer concluded that while all rackets possessed significant power, the balance of power and control should guide the selection. The Speed MP emerged as the more versatile and user-friendly option.