This review dives into the Babolat Pure Strike 16x19 3rd Generation tennis racquet, examining its performance on the court. With a 98 sq. in. head size, 305g unstrung weight, and a stiffness rating of 67, this racquet promises a powerful and spin-friendly experience. We'll explore its feel, power, and control, analyzing its performance from the baseline, the net, and on serve. A direct comparison with the popular Project One 7 will highlight the key differences and help determine which racquet best suits different playing styles.This in-depth analysis will assess the Pure Strike's strengths and weaknesses, providing valuable insights for players considering this racquet. We'll discuss the noticeable "club-like" feel, the impressive spin generation capabilities, and the racquet's overall maneuverability. Ultimately, we aim to determine whether the Babolat Pure Strike 16x19 3rd Gen lives up to its powerful and spin-friendly reputation and who might benefit most from its unique characteristics.
Pros And Cons
- More plow through and power compared to the Project One Seven.
- Maneuverable.
- Good sweet spot.
- Comfortable.
- Creates good spin.
- Powerful, solid, and stable.
- Encourages aggressive baseline play.
- Good performance at the net.
- Larger sweet spot than Project One Seven.
- No arm issues reported even with various strings.
- Initial feeling described as 'club-like' due to balance point.
- Slices felt like they were flying, less control than with other rackets.
- Took time to dial in serve initially.
- Fantastic racket (according to reviewer).
- Brought power, spin, and control.
- Reviewer felt more connected to it and had more range of shots, especially approach shots and slices.
Read more: 5 Best Babolat Tennis Rackets to Dominate the Court
Specifications and First Impressions
The Babolat Pure Strike 16x19 3rd Gen boasts impressive specs: a 98 sq. in. head size, 305g unstrung weight, and a measured balance point of 33.5 cm. Its stiffness rating is 67, similar to its predecessor, but the swing weight and balance point differ significantly. This results in a more head-heavy feel, promising enhanced power and plow-through.
Upon initial inspection and wielding the racquet, I immediately noticed a 'club-like' feeling. This isn't inherently negative but is noticeably different from other brands. The handle, characteristically Babolat, also contributes to the overall hand feel – a difference some may find more or less appealing.
On-Court Performance: Baseline and Serves
Baseline play was immediately enjoyable. The power and spin were substantial, allowing for easy depth and pace, particularly on my forehand. This racquet felt incredibly spin-friendly, reminiscent of the Project One 7.
The initial 'sweet spot' sensation lessened with extended play. However, consistent power, solid stability, and impressive spin generation remained. While powerful, I found my slice shots less precise; they lacked the control and 'knifing' feel of other racquets I've tested.
Net Play and Serve
Net play was exceptionally stable and comfortable; the sweet spot felt enlarged compared to the Project One 7. Maneuverability was also excellent.
My serve required adjustment. The initial serves felt less consistent, but my second serves excelled in accuracy and spin. This racquet's spin generation was particularly beneficial on second serves, enabling powerful kicks and controlled placement.
Comparison with Project One 7 and Overall Conclusion
A direct comparison with the Project One 7 revealed subtle but significant differences. While both racquets share a similar feel, the third-generation Pure Strike offers increased power and easier depth. The Project One 7 felt more intuitive for me in certain shots and overall game strategy.
The Babolat Pure Strike 16x19 3rd Gen is a strong contender for aggressive baseliners seeking more control than pure power racquets. It's comfortable, powerful, and generates impressive spin. However, the Project One 7 might still be preferred by players desiring a wider range of shot versatility and a more nuanced feel. The choice depends ultimately on playing style and preferences.